Merilien v. State
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
Date FiledJune 16, 2026
DocketS26A0704
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.
In the
Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0704
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
v.
The State
On Appeal from the Superior Court of Rockdale County
No. 2006CR1147
Decided: August 13, 2026
PINSON, Justice.
In 2006, Jean Jocelyn Merilien pleaded guilty to two counts
of murder and one count of possession of a firearm during the
commission of a felony. He was sentenced to two consecutive
terms of life plus five years to serve in prison. He did not appeal.
Just over 19 years later, on September 3, 2025, Merilien
sought relief under OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which allows a defendant to
move for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal within 100
days from the expiration of the time to appeal under certain cir-
cumstances, or until June 30, 2026, if the defendant had an out-
of-time notice of appeal (or motion seeking one) dismissed under
Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471 (2022). In a summary order, the trial
court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
That decision was correct. This Court held in Cook that a
trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider a motion for leave to file
an out-of-time notice of appeal. See Cook, 313 Ga. at 505–06. In
response, the General Assembly enacted OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which
grants trial courts jurisdiction to consider such motions. See id.
§ 5-6-39.1(a)(2). 1 But in doing so, that statute also sets time limits
for filing such motions: a defendant may move for leave to file an
out-of-time notice of appeal “within 100 days from the expiration
of the time period for the filing of” a notice of appeal, id. § 5-6-
39.1(a)(1), or, if an earlier out-of-time notice of appeal or motion
seeking one was dismissed under Cook, until June 30, 2026, id.
§ 5-6-39.1(a)(1). Like other statutory requirements for obtaining
an appeal, these time limits for seeking leave to file a notice of
appeal are jurisdictional. See, e.g., Kelly v. State, 311 Ga. 827, 828
(2021); State v. Wheeler, 310 Ga. 72, 73 (2020); Duke v. State, 306
Ga. 171, 186 (2019); Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 85 (2011). And
Merilien’s motion here meets neither of these time limits, because
the time for Merilien to appeal his 2006 convictions expired far
longer than 100 days ago, see id. § 5-6-39.1(a)(1), and the record
does not show that he had a motion or out-of-time notice of appeal
dismissed under Cook, see id. § 5-6-39.1(b). So the trial court
lacked jurisdiction to consider Merilien’s motion, and it properly
dismissed the motion on that basis.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Warren,
P.J., not participating.
1 Code section 5-6-39.1 also grants jurisdiction to consider a motion for
leave to file an out-of-time motion for new trial.
2