Scott Mundt v. Woodruff Property Management A/A/F Vineyard Villas Apartments
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledNovember 6, 2026
DocketA27D0310
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
November 06, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27D0310. SCOTT MUNDT v. WOODRUFF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
A/A/F VINEYARD VILLAS APARTMENTS.
On October 27, 2026, the Spalding County Magistrate Court entered an order
granting plaintiff Woodruff Property Management a/a/f Vineyard Villas Apartments
a writ of possession. Defendant Scott Mundt filed this pro se application for
discretionary appeal on November 2, 2026, seeking leave to appeal the October 27
magistrate court order. We lack jurisdiction.
Ordinarily, the only avenue of appeal available from a magistrate court
judgment is provided by OCGA ยง 15-10-41(b)(1), which provides for appellate review
in the state or superior court. See Tate v. Habif, 367 Ga. App. 435, 438โ39(2) (886
SE2d 389) (2023). Thus, this Court has jurisdiction to address a magistrate court
order only if it has been reviewed by a state or superior court. See Westwind Corp. v.
Washington Fed. S & L Assโn, 195 Ga. App. 411, 411(1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990); Baker
v. G. T., Ltd., 194 Ga. App. 450, 451(3) (391 SE2d 1) (1990). The Georgia Constitution
provides that โ[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil
case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere.โ Ga. Const. of
1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII. Accord Ga. Ct. App. R. 11(b).
Accordingly, to the extent that this filing may be construed as a petition for
review under OCGA ยง 5-3-1 et seq., it is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Spalding
County Magistrate Court with direction to transmit it to the state or superior court for
disposition as appropriate. We recognize that we are in possession of limited materials
and that our determination that jurisdiction may lie in another court is limited by the
dearth of information. Thus, our ruling should not constrain either the magistrate
court or the state or superior court to the extent that those courts determine either
that Mundt has not perfected the right to appeal or that jurisdiction lies elsewhere.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerkโs Office, Atlanta,____________________
11/06/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.