John P. Curry v. Sarah Owensby
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledAugust 7, 2026
DocketA27D0015
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
August 07, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27D0015. JOHN P. CURRY v. SARAH OWENSBY.
John Curry has timely filed a discretionary application from the trial court’s
order denying his motion to vacate a void judgment and awarding attorney fees under
the anti-SLAPP statute, OCGA § 9-11-11.1(b.1).1 No discretionary application is
required, however, as “[a]ll judgments or orders entered pursuant to Code Section
9-11-11.1” are directly appealable under OCGA § 5-6-34(a)(13), and this action does
not appear to fall within one of the categories of cases for which a discretionary
application is required to seek appellate review under OCGA § 5-6-35(a).
Under OCGA § 5-6-35(j), this Court will grant a timely application for
discretionary review if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See City of
Rincon v. Couch, 272 Ga. App. 411, 412 (612 SE2d 596) (2005). Accordingly, this
application is hereby GRANTED. Curry shall have ten days from the date of this
order to file a notice of appeal in the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-35(g). If he has
already filed a notice of appeal in the trial court, then he need not file a second notice.
1
We affirmed the trial court’s order granting Sarah Owensby’s motion to strike
under the anti-SLAPP statute in Curry v. Owensby, No. A25A2181 (Ga. App. Oct. 1,
2025) (unpublished).
The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the
record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
08/07/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.