Jaylend Glispie v. State
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledJuly 6, 2026
DocketA26A2050
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
July 06, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A2050. JAYLEND GLISPIE v. THE STATE.
Jaylend Glispie, appearing pro se, appeals directly to this Court from the trial
court’s order revoking his probation. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.
First, Glispie has no right of direct appeal from the trial court’s order. Under
OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(5), appeals from probation revocation orders must be made by
application for discretionary review. Todd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 757, 758 (513 SE2d
287) (1999). And because compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is
jurisdictional, failure to comply with that procedure, where applicable, requires
dismissal of the appeal. Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Georgia, 360 Ga. App.
901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021).
Furthermore, even if Glispie were entitled to a direct appeal, this appeal is
untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or
trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38(a). The proper and timely
filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this
Court. Yanes v. Escobar, 362 Ga. App. 896, 898 (870 SE2d 506) (2022). Here,
Glispie’s notice of appeal was filed 49 days after entry of the trial court’s order,
meaning that his appeal is untimely.
Given our lack of jurisdiction, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
07/06/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.