JOSEPH DANIEL FINCHER v. TERRY E. BARNARD
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledAugust 12, 2026
DocketA27O0003
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
August 12, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27O0003. JOSEPH DANIEL FINCHER v. TERRY E. BARNARD et al.
Joseph Daniel Fincher filed this original mandamus petition in the Supreme
Court of Georgia seeking an order compelling the Board of Pardons and Paroles to
grant him immediate release, and the Supreme Court transferred the matter to this
Court. See Case No. S26O1645 (July 16, 2026). For reasons that follow, Fincher’s
petition is dismissed.
Both the superior and appellate courts of this state “have the power to issue
process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto,
and injunction.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV. As explained by the
Supreme Court of Georgia, however, an appellate court’s authority to issue such writs
“is connected only to such powers as necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect
or effectuate its judgments. It does not grant jurisdiction to [the appellate court] to
issue process as an original matter wholly unconnected to its appellate jurisdiction.”
Arnold v. Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 334(1) (914 SE2d 311) (2025) (quotation marks
omitted). Thus, “it will be an ‘extremely rare’ circumstance that would require a
party to seek a writ of mandamus in [an appellate court] in the first instance.” Id. at
335(1) n.6.
Here, Fincher has not shown that his mandamus petition is related to an appeal
or impending appeal, or is necessary in aid of our appellate jurisdiction or to effectuate
any appellate court judgments. Fincher claims that he filed his petition in superior
court and that it was returned without explanation. However, there is no order
rejecting his filing in the documents he filed with this Court. Absent some ruling by
superior court, and an appeal or impending appeal therefrom, this Court’s original
mandamus jurisdiction is not invoked under Arnold. See Arnold, 321 Ga. at 334(1). For
this reason, his petition is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
08/12/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.