Dana Street v. Charles L. Marks, IV

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 21, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A27A0184. DANA STREET v. CHARLES L. MARKS, IV. Plaintiff Dana Street filed this pro se direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial and/or reconsideration following the issuance of a final judgment and decree in this divorce action. We lack jurisdiction. “Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2), (b). See Onyemobi v. Onyemobi, 375 Ga. App. 538, 538, 540–41 (916 SE2d 738) (2025). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dep’t of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Street’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Onyemobi, 375 Ga. App. at 541; Smoak, 221 Ga. App. at 257–58. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/21/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk.