Derrick B. Jackson v. Alison Burleson, Judge
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledSeptember 22, 2026
DocketA27O0004
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
September 22, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27O0004. JACKSON v. BURLESON.
Derrick B. Jackson filed the instant original mandamus petition,1 seeking an
order compelling the trial court judge in his criminal case to rule on various post-
conviction motions. He has filed a motion to amend the original mandamus petition,
conceding that the trial court judge has now “issued orders denying all of Petitioner’s
motions.” In the motion to amend, he seems to be asking for an order compelling the
trial court judge to set a hearing and argues that the trial court judge erred in denying
him an appeal bond.
The claims that Jackson asserted in his original mandamus petition are moot.
And his proposed amendment does not properly assert a claim for original mandamus
relief.
“Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to
issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo
warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such
relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v.
Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), disapproved on other grounds,
Arnold v. Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 336(1) (914 SE2d 311) (2025). See Ga. Const. of
1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV (providing that appellate courts have mandamus
1
Jackson filed the petition in the Supreme Court of Georgia, which transferred
it here. Case No. S26O1643 (July 16, 2026).
authority in aid of their jurisdiction). Moreover, mandamus will issue “only if (1) no
other adequate legal remedy is available to effectuate the relief sought; and (2) the
applicant has a clear legal right to such relief.” Bibb County v. Monroe County, 294 Ga.
730, 734(2) (755 SE2d 760) (2014). Here, Jackson has an adequate legal remedy
because a trial court’s order denying a motion for appeal bond is directly appealable.
See Luke v. State, 282 Ga. App. 749 (639 SE2d 645) (2006); Wade v. State, 218 Ga.
App. 377, 377-78(1) (461 SE2d 314) (1995).
For these reasons, Jackson’s original petition for mandamus and motion to
amend are hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
09/22/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.