Gwendolyn Patricia Austin v. Jonathan Querisma
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledAugust 12, 2026
DocketA26A0995
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
August 12, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A0995. GWENDOLYN PATRICIA AUSTIN v. JONATHAN QUERISMA.
Jonathan Querisma, a former tenant of Gwendolyn Patricia Austin, sued Austin
seeking to recover damages for personal property that Austin allegedly damaged or
disposed of. Following a bench trial, the court found in favor of Querisma and entered
a judgment against Austin for $5,000. Austin then filed this direct appeal. We lack
jurisdiction.
Appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must
be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(6), (b);
Pathfinder Payment Solutions v. Global Payments Direct, 344 Ga. App. 490, 490–91 (810
SE2d 653) (2018); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357, 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998).
“Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional,” Hair
Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021)
(citation and punctuation omitted). And “[f]ailure to file an application when one is
necessary requires that the appeal be dismissed.” Evans v. Jackson, 368 Ga. App. 170,
173 (1)(b) (889 SE2d 343) (2023) (citation and punctuation omitted).
Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
08/12/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.