Tommy Siebert v. Akeem Jamal Gentry
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledAugust 17, 2026
DocketA26A1024
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
August 17, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A1024. TOMMY SIEBERT v. AKEEM JAMAL GENTRY.
This action originated in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Tommy
Siebert filed a petition for review to the superior court. The superior court upheld the
magistrate court’s judgment, and Siebert filed a notice of appeal to this Court. We lack
jurisdiction.
Appeals from decisions of superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts
by petition for review must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary
review. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1), (b). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals
procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dep’t of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257
(471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because Siebert seeks to appeal a superior court decision
reviewing a decision of the magistrate court, he was required to file an application for
discretionary review. His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct
appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
08/17/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.