Korey Maddox v. Edward Mumphery
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledAugust 13, 2026
DocketA27A0085
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
August 13, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27A0085. KOREY MADDOX v. EDWARD MUMPHERY.
This dispossessory matter originated in magistrate court. Following a magistrate
court judgment in favor of Edward Mumphery, Korey Maddox filed a petition for
review in superior court. The superior court issued a writ of possession, and Maddox
filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
Appeals from decisions of superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts by
petition for review must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.
OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is
jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dep’t of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60)
(1996). Because Maddox seeks to appeal a superior court decision reviewing a decision
of the magistrate court, he was required to file an application for discretionary review.
His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby
DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
08/13/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.