Jorden Clark v. Armour Drive Ga Partners LLC Dba Cortland at Armour Yards Fka Marquis Midtown Di
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledOctober 26, 2026
DocketA27D0238
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
October 26, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27D0238. JORDEN CLARK v. ARMOUR DRIVE GA PARTNERS LLC DBA
CORTLAND AT ARMOUR YARDS FKA MARQUIS MIDTOWN DI.
In this dispossessory action, on September 30, 2026, the magistrate court issued
an order denying Jorden Clark’s request to file a late answer. Eleven days later, on
October 11, 2026, Clark filed this application for discretionary review, seeking to
appeal the September 30 order. We lack jurisdiction.
Ordinarily, the only avenue of appeal available from a magistrate court
judgment is governed by OCGA § 15-10-41(b), which provides for appellate review
in state or superior court. See Tate v. Habif, 367 Ga. App. 435, 438–39(2) (886 SE2d
389) (2023). “Thus, this Court has jurisdiction to address a magistrate court order
only if the order has been reviewed by a state or superior court.” Harris v. Reserve at
Hollywood, 376 Ga. App. 553, 553 (920 SE2d 163) (2025). The Georgia Constitution
provides that “[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil
case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere.” Ga. Const. of
1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII. Accord Ga. Ct. App. R. 11(b).
“As such, this Court at times has transferred applications seeking review of
magistrate court orders back to the magistrate court with direction to send the case to
state or superior court.” Harris, 376 Ga. App. at 553. Here, however, the order Clark
seeks to appeal is interlocutory. Superior and state courts have jurisdiction over only
final judgments in magistrate court. See OCGA § 5-3-4(a) (“[T]he superior and state
courts shall have appellate jurisdiction . . . over a final judgment of a lower
judicatory.”). See also OCGA § 5-3-3(4) (“‘Final judgment’ means a decision of a
lower judicatory in a case that is no longer pending in a lower judicatory.”).
Regardless, even if Clark’s application did not improperly seek review of an
interlocutory magistrate court order, it is untimely because it was filed more than
seven days after the entry of that order. See OCGA § 44-7-56(b)(1); Stubbs v. Local
Homes, 375 Ga. App. 513, 515–16 (915 SE2d 91) (2025) (while applications for
discretionary review generally may be filed within thirty days of entry of the order
sought to be appealed, an application in a dispossessory proceeding must be filed
within seven days of the order on appeal). Accord Harris, 376 Ga. App. at 553. The
deadlines for filing discretionary applications are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot
accept an application not made in compliance therewith. Harris, 376 Ga. App. at 553.
Thus, we decline to transfer this case to magistrate court with direction to send it to
state or superior court. Rather, this untimely application from an interlocutory order
is hereby DISMISSED. See id.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
10/26/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.