Kandice Anderson v. Natalie Smith
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledNovember 9, 2026
DocketA27A0775
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
November 09, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27A0775. KANDICE ANDERSON v. NATALIE SMITH.
In this defamation action, defendant Kandice Anderson filed a pro se notice of
appeal from a superior court order awarding the plaintiff $5,000 in damages. We lack
jurisdiction.
An appeal from an action for damages when the judgment is $10,000 or less
must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA §
5-6-35(a)(6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357, 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998).
“Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v.
Dep’t of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Anderson’s failure
to follow the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal,
which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
11/09/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.