Samuel F Cooper v. Truist Bank
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledJuly 6, 2026
DocketA26D0589
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
July 06, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26D0589. SAMUEL F. COOPER v. TRUIST BANK.
In 2024, Samuel Cooper filed an action against Truist Bank, asserting it had
violated provisions of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in
Lending Act. Truist Bank subsequently filed a motion to quash the summons and
service, which the trial court granted after finding that Cooper’s summons failed to
comply with OCGA § 9-11-4(b) and that Cooper failed to serve Truist Bank at the
appropriate address.1 Cooper then filed a motion to set aside that order pursuant to
OCGA § 9-11-60(d). The trial court denied Cooper’s motion and ordered Cooper to
properly serve Truist Bank with a copy of the complaint and a legally sufficient
summons. Cooper then filed this application for discretionary appeal. We, however,
lack jurisdiction.
As Cooper admits in his application, the trial court’s order he is seeking to
appeal is interlocutory and not final. Because this case remains pending below, Cooper
was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures — including
obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court — to obtain appellate
review at this juncture. See OCGA § 5-6-34(b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435
(383 SE2d 906) (1989).
Where, as here, both discretionary and interlocutory appeal procedures apply,
an applicant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedures. Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of
1
Cooper filed a discretionary application seeking to appeal the quash order,
which this Court dismissed. Case No. A25D0483 (July 29, 2025).
Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588–89(1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991); OCGA §
5-6-35(a)(8) (an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside under OCGA §
9-11-60(d) must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review).
Accordingly, Cooper’s failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures
deprives us of jurisdiction over this application for discretionary appeal, which is
hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
07/06/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.