Robert Clinton Lemons v. State
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledJune 24, 2026
DocketA26A2249
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
June 24, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A2249. ROBERT CLINTON LEMONS v. THE STATE.
In 2014, Robert Clinton Lemons pled guilty to four counts of theft by receiving
stolen property, and he was sentenced to five years, to serve two in confinement and
the remainder on probation. In 2016, Lemons pled guilty to one count of attempted
burglary, and he was sentenced to serve four years in confinement. In 2026, Lemons
filed motions to vacate a void judgment in both cases. The trial court dismissed both
motions in a single order, and Lemons appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
A motion seeking to challenge an allegedly void judgment of conviction โis not
one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a
criminal case.โ Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Any appeal
from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. Harper v. State,
286 Ga. 216, 218(1), (2) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). An appeal may lie from an order
denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant
raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. Harper, 286 Ga. at 217(1) n.1.
A sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow, typically
because the sentence exceeds the most severe punishment allowed by statute. See
Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611(1) (409 SE2d 517) (1991); von Thomas v. State, 293
Ga. 569, 572(2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013).
In his amended motions to vacate a void judgment, Lemons argued that he
received ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his pleas and that he was
misled about the applicable law. These are challenges to the validity of his convictions,
not his sentences. See Jones v. State, 354 Ga. App. 29, 34โ35(2) (840 SE2d 117)
(2020).
Because Lemons has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim, we lack
jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerkโs Office, Atlanta,____________________
06/24/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.