Mistee Dawn Rowland v. Elizabeth Braun
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledAugust 17, 2026
DocketA27D0005
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
August 17, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A27D0005. MISTEE DAWN ROWLAND v. ELIZABETH BRAUN.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered
that it be hereby DENIED.
MCFADDEN, PRESIDING JUDGE, CONCURRING FULLY AND SPECIALLY.
MCFADDEN, Presiding Judge, concurring fully and specially.
Our Supreme Court has held, โWhere a party โputs the machinery of
immediate appellate review into motion, yet commits a procedural default fatal to his
appeal,โ that party โis foreclosed from thereafter resubmitting the matter for review
on appeal.โ Mitchell v. Oliver, 254 Ga. 112, 114 (327 SE2d 216) (1985).โ Massey v.
Massey, 294 Ga. 163, 165 (2) (751 SE2d 330) (2013) (punctuation omitted). The case
before us falls under that line of authority. โOf course, we are bound to abide by the
decisions of our Supreme Court.โ Harmon v. Progressive Premier Ins. Co. of Illinois, 370
Ga. App. 540, 541โ42 (2) (897 SE2d 653) (2024). So I concur.
But I reiterate our respectful suggestion in the footnote to Harmon. โ[O]ur
Supreme Court should reexamine that rule. It is a judge-made rule.โ Harmon, 370 Ga.
App. at 542 (2) n. 1. We detailed in the note that, โ[a]s a matter of logic, Mitchell
cannot withstand analysisโ and โ[a]s a matter of policy, Mitchell is inconsistent with
the express intent and the express direction of the Appellate Practice Act.โ Harmon,
supra.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerkโs Office, Atlanta,____________________
08/17/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.