Victor Lucky v. Beatrice Cazeau, Etc.
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledSeptember 9, 2026
Docket3D2026-0101
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed September 9, 2026.
________________
No. 3D26-0101
Lower Tribunal No. 25-23082-CA-01
________________
Victor Lucky,
Appellant,
vs.
Beatrice Cazeau, etc., et al.,
Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R.
Lopez, Judge.
Victor Lucky, in proper person.
Holland & Knight LLP, and Christopher N. Bellows & Jose A. Casal;
The Monestime Firm, P.A., and Regine Monestime (Coral Springs), for
appellees.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Pro se appellant Victor Lucky appeals the lower court’s January 5,
2026 order that dismissed, as moot, Lucky’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Lucky had sought below an order compelling the traffic magistrate to rule on
three motions Lucky had filed in his traffic court proceedings (case number
AM9FLME). We affirm because the record supports the trial court’s
determination that the traffic magistrate’s setting of a pretrial hearing in
Lucky’s traffic case for January 21, 2026, mooted his mandamus petition. No
motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court.
Affirmed.1
1
After briefing was complete in this case, Lucky filed an August 4, 2026
motion seeking leave to file an amended reply brief. We grant this motion;
we have considered Lucky’s amended reply brief in the disposition of this
appeal. We deny both Lucky’s August 5, 2026 motion seeking leave to file
an amended initial brief and his August 6, 2026 motion for leave to file
another amended initial brief.
2