Nance Carol Goulding v. Jason Ross Goulding
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJune 29, 2022
Docket2D21-3044
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
NANCE CAROL GOULDING,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
JASON ROSS GOULDING,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 2D21-3044
June 29, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Linda R. Allan,
Judge.
Nance Carol Goulding, pro se Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Kathy C. George of George & French, Dunedin, for Appellee/Cross-
Appellant.
PER CURIAM.
Nance Carol Goulding (the Former Wife) appeals and Jason
Ross Goulding (the Former Husband) cross-appeals the
postdissolution order that resolves various motions for contempt
filed by the parties and denies the supplemental petition for
modification of the final dissolution judgment filed by the Former
Husband.
On appeal, we affirm without comment the portion of the order
that denies the Former Wife's motion for contempt and grants the
Former Husband's motion for contempt. We dismiss the appeal,
however, to the extent that it challenges the portion of the order
requiring the Former Wife to pay to the Former Husband attorney's
fees and costs incurred in connection with his motion for contempt.
See Cancellari v. Rance, 779 So. 2d 373, 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
("Although the order establishes entitlement to fees and costs, it
does not set the amount. Consequently, it is a nonfinal,
nonappealable order and we lack jurisdiction to review it." (citing
Ritter v. Ritter, 690 So. 2d 1372, 1376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997))). On
cross-appeal, we affirm without comment the portion of the order
that denies the Former Husband's supplemental petition for
modification.
Order affirmed in part; appeal dismissed in part.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ.,
Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2