Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association, Inc. v. Srp Sub LLC
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMay 20, 2020
Docket3D19-0528
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 20, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-528
Lower Tribunal No. 13-36649
________________
Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association, Inc.,
Appellant,
vs.
SRP SUB, LLC,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan
Scola, Judge.
Paige Law Group, P.A., and Robert E. Paige, for appellant.
Tepps Treco, and William A. Treco (Sunrise), for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and HENDON, JJ.
HENDON, J.
Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association, Inc. (“Association”)
appeals from an amended final judgment entered against it and in favor of SRP SUB,
LLC (“SRP SUB) on SRP SUB’s action for declaratory relief and on the
Association’s counterclaim to foreclose its homeowners association lien. We affirm.
SRP SUB was the successful bidder at a foreclosure sale on a first mortgage
held by Wells Fargo. After the Miami-Dade County Clerk issued the certificate of
title, SRP SUB filed an action for declaratory relief, seeking a determination as to
its liability for assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of
title. Thereafter, the Association filed a counterclaim to foreclose the homeowners
association lien for assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate
of title. SRP SUB had paid all assessments that have accrued after the issuance of
the certificate of title.
At the non-jury trial, the parties agreed that SRP SUB’s liability for
assessments that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of title hinged on the
trial court’s interpretation of several provisions of the Declaration of Covenant and
Restrictions of Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay (“Declaration”), specifically Article VI,
Sections 1; Article VI, Section 10; and Article VIII(b), which provide as follows:
VI. COVENANTS FOR MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS.
Section 1. Creation of the Lien and Personal Obligation of
Assessments. The Developer, for each Unit owned by it within the
Development, hereby covenants and each member of a member
association as an Owner of a Unit (by acceptance of a deed therefore,
whether or not it shall be so expressed in any such deed or other
conveyance) including any purchaser at a judicial sale, shall hereafter
2
be deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association any annual
assessments or charges, and any special assessments for capital
improvements or major repair; such assessments to be fixed,
established and collected from time to time as hereinafter provided. All
such assessments, together with interest thereon from the due date at
the rate of eighteen (18%) percent per annum and costs of collection
thereof (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), shall be a charge on the
land and shall be a continuing lien upon the Unit(s) against which each
such assessment is made, and shall also be the personal obligation of
the Owner. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the
assessment provided for herein by non-use of the Common Areas or by
abandonment.
....
Section 10. Subordination of the Lien to Mortgages. The lien of
the assessments provided for herein shall be a lien superior to all other
liens save and except tax liens and mortgage liens, provided said
mortgage liens are first liens against the property encumbered thereby,
subject only to tax liens, and said first mortgage secures an
indebtedness which is amortized on monthly or quarter-annual
payments over a period of not less than ten (10) years. The sale or
transfer of any Lot pursuant to the foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu
thereof of a first mortgage meeting the above qualifications, shall
extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which became
due prior to such sale or transfer. No sale or transfer shall relieve such
Lot from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due or from
the lien thereof.
....
VIII. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION.
The following provisions are added hereto (and to the extent
these added provisions conflict with any other provisions of the
Declaration, these added provisions shall control):
....
(b) Each first Mortgagee of a Mortgage encumbering any Unit
which obtains title to such Unit pursuant to the remedies provided in
such Mortgage or by foreclosure of such Mortgage, shall take title to
such Unit free and clear of any claims of unpaid assessments or charges
against such Unit which accrued prior to the acquisition of title to such
Unit by the Mortgagee.
3
In addition to these provisions, SRP SUB also relied on this court’s opinion
in Beacon Hill Homeowners Ass’n, Inc. v. Colfin Ah-Florida 7, LLC, 221 So. 3d
710 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), which also addressed the Declaration of Covenant and
Restrictions of Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay, and specifically, Article VI, Section
10. This court held as follows:
The case before us is exactly on point with Pudlit [2 Joint Venture, LLP
v. Westwood Gardens Homeowners Association, Inc. 169 So. 3d 145
(Fla. 4th DCA 2015)]. The joint and several liability of section
720.3085(2)(b) was not incorporated into the terms of the
[Association’s] Declaration[]. Accordingly, under the language
adopted by the [Association] in [its] Declaration[], Colfin was not liable
for any past due assessments, attorney’s fees, or costs of the prior owner
when it purchased the property in question at the foreclosure sale, for
the reasons set forth in Pudlit.
Beacon Hill, 221 So. 3d at 713 (footnote omitted).
In the instant case, the trial court’s amended final judgment sets forth a
thorough and well-reasoned analysis of the relevant provisions in the Declaration
and the application of Beacon Hill. In our de novo review, we find no error in the
trial court’s interpretation of the relevant provisions, and agree with the trial court’s
determination that SRP SUB is not liable for any of the past due assessments,
attorney’s fees and/or costs that accrued prior to the issuance of the certificate of
title. Accordingly, we affirm the amended final judgment. The remaining
arguments raised by the Association do not merit discussion.
Affirmed.
4