Sabrina Elise Crespo v. Walter Lee Watts, Jr., and State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledAugust 12, 2020
Docket1D19-4194
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-4194
_____________________________
SABRINA ELISE CRESPO,
Appellant,
v.
WALTER LEE WATTS, JR., and
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT
PROGRAM,
Appellees.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings.
Elizabeth W. McArthur, Administrative Law Judge.
August 12, 2020
PER CURIAM.
The mother raises two issues on appeal. In her first issue, the
mother argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by
imputing her 2018 wages to her. We agree that this was error and
reverse. We affirm the second issue without comment.
The record shows that in 2018, the mother applied for
assistance, and the Department of Revenue (DOR) assisted her
with establishing paternity and support for the parties’ child.
After DOR sent the parties a proposed final order of paternity and
support, the father timely requested a hearing. When the matter
came before the ALJ for a hearing, the mother failed to appear
even though she was properly noticed.
During the hearing, the ALJ noted the lack of financial
information she had for the mother. The mother filled out only two
of the six pages concerning her financial information, and one of
those pages contained only the mother’s signature and the date.
At some point in time, the mother provided her 2018 W-2 and a
form stating that she was a full-time student. Because the mother
was receiving cash assistance, DOR indicated that the mother was
not working. However, no evidence was presented concerning why
or how the mother became unemployed.
Florida law requires an ALJ to impute income to a parent in
accordance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019), unless
there is a lack of reliable, current financial information available.
§ 409.2563(6), Fla. Stat. (2019). When determining whether to
impute income, the trier of fact must first determine whether the
unemployment was voluntary, followed by a determination of the
amount of income to be imputed. Windsor v. Windsor, 262 So. 3d
853, 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). In order to determine whether a
parent’s unemployment is voluntary, the court applies a two-step
process: (1) whether the termination of employment was
voluntary, and (2) whether the unemployment resulted from the
parent’s pursuit of her own interests or through the less-than-
diligent and bona fide efforts to find employment at or higher than
her former employment. Wood v. Wood, 162 So. 3d 133, 136 (Fla.
1st DCA 2014).
The ALJ noted that she did not know why the mother was
unemployed, and there is no evidence in the record concerning this
issue. Because there was no evidence concerning the reason
behind the mother’s unemployment, the ALJ could not determine
whether the mother’s unemployment was voluntary. Since the
ALJ could not determine if the mother’s unemployment was
voluntary, the ALJ could not impute income to the mother in
accordance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019).
In addition to not knowing whether the mother was
voluntarily unemployed, the ALJ possessed very little information
about the mother’s income. The information the ALJ had was not
2
reliable and current. As a result, section 409.2563(6) required the
ALJ to presume the mother was capable of earning the federal
minimum wage. Since the father did not present any evidence to
rebut this presumption, the ALJ was required to impute the
federal minimum wage. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for
the ALJ to impute the federal minimum wage to the mother and
to recalculate the father’s child support accordingly.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with
instructions.
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Moses Robert DeWitt and Phillip D. Wayne of the DeWitt Law
Firm, P.A. Orlando, for Appellant.
Jose C. Gonzalez of Jose C. Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa; Ashley Moody,
Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney
General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
3