Full Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D20-778 _____________________________ ANDREW R. MOODY, Appellant, v. NATALIA YEVGENYEVNA MOODY, n/k/a NATALIA YEVGENYEVNA ARRINGTON, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County. Kevin J. Carroll, Judge. May 11, 2021 PER CURIAM. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REHEARING EN BANC AND WRITTEN OPINION On consideration of Appellant’s motion for rehearing and Appellee’s amended response stipulating that it is clear on the face of the order being appealed that the trial court erroneously used the parties’ gross incomes in calculating child support, we withdraw our per curiam affirmance dated March 17, 2021, grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing in part, and substitute the following opinion in its place. Appellant, Andrew R. Moody, appeals the trial court’s Order on Remand and Ruling on Other Pending Matters, raising several issues, only one of which merits discussion. Appellant argues, and Appellee stipulates, that it is clear on the face of the order that in calculating child support, the trial court erroneously used the parties’ gross incomes and failed to subtract any allowable deductions. Section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019), sets forth the child support guidelines, and it requires a trial court to compute each parent’s net income by subtracting allowable deductions such as federal income tax from his or her gross income and to determine each parent’s percentage share of the child support need by dividing each parent’s net monthly income by the combined net monthly income. § 61.30(3)(a), (4), (9) Fla. Stat. (2019); see also Finney v. Finney, 995 So. 2d 579, 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (explaining the steps a trial court must take in determining child support pursuant to the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30). Because the trial court’s order and the attached child support guidelines worksheets reflect that the court determined child support using the parties’ gross incomes, without subtracting allowable deductions, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Marini v. Kellett, 279 So. 3d 248, 254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (reversing because the trial court improperly calculated child support using the parties’ gross incomes). We affirm the order in all other respects. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions. LEWIS, ROBERTS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Andrew R. Moody, pro se, Appellant. Edward W. Horan, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2