Richard Figueredo v. Ana M. Cordero
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJune 17, 2020
Docket3D19-1896
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed June 17, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-1896
Lower Tribunal No. 18-1318
________________
Richard Figueredo,
Appellant,
vs.
Ana M. Cordero,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto,
Judge.
Richard Figueredo, in proper person.
Carlos A. Santos, II, for appellee.
Before SALTER, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Richard Figueredo appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for
revocation of probate and asserts he was precluded from participating in the hearing.
Figueredo, who is incarcerated, filed a motion on July 22, 2019, to appear
telephonically at the hearing scheduled for August 1, 2019. The record before us
does not reflect that the trial court ruled on Figueredo’s motion to appear by
telephone. On August 1, 2019, the court denied the petition for revocation of probate
based on Figueredo’s failure to appear.
“An incarcerated party has a right to be heard in civil matters if the party has
brought to the court’s attention his or her desire to appear personally or
telephonically.” Butler v. Norton, 158 So. 3d 750, 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (quoting
Garrett v. Pratt, 128 So. 3d 928, 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)). “When a party is
incarcerated and cannot physically appear in a civil matter, the trial court normally
should grant a request to hold necessary hearings by telephone, pursuant to the
procedure outlined in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration [2.530], as an
alternative to requiring that the inmate be transported to the hearing by the state.”
Id. (quoting Johnson v. Johnson, 783 So. 2d 326, 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)); see Fla.
R. Jud. Admin. 2.530(c).1 As the trial court did not issue any ruling regarding
1
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.530(c):
A county or circuit court judge may, upon the written
request of a party upon reasonable notice to all other
parties, permit a requesting party to participate through
2
Figueredo’s motion, we reverse and remand for further proceedings to include
permitting him to file another motion for telephonic hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
communication equipment in a scheduled motion hearing;
however, any such request (except in criminal, juvenile,
and appellate proceedings) must be granted, absent a
showing of good cause to deny the same, where the
hearing is set for not longer than 15 minutes.
3