Tashara Freeman v. Precious Rogers
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJune 23, 2021
Docket2D20-2359
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
TASHARA J. FREEMAN,
Appellant,
v.
PRECIOUS ROGERS,
Appellee.
No. 2D20-2359
June 23, 2021
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Reinaldo J. Ojeda,
Judge.
Tashara J. Freeman, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.
MORRIS, Judge.
Tashara Freeman appeals a final judgment of injunction for
protection against stalking entered in favor of Precious Rogers. The
final judgment of injunction indicates that Freeman failed to appear
for the injunction hearing. The record indicates that the parties
were instructed to appear virtually for the hearing in Polk County
Circuit Civil, Family Court, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Freeman was required to drive to the courthouse, stay in her car,
and appear before the judge via the virtual courtroom or
teleconference. The instructions provided a phone number and
conference ID for appearing by teleconference.
On appeal, Freeman asserts that the trial court erred in
entering the judgment when she was unable to appear virtually at
the hearing. She claims that she called into the hearing but was
disconnected. She raised this issue in a timely motion for
rehearing, which the trial court denied. In denying Freeman's
motion for rehearing, the trial court did not address her allegations
that she tried to appear virtually. We reverse and remand for the
trial court to either conduct a hearing on Freeman's motion for
rehearing to determine whether her failure to appear virtually at the
injunction hearing was justifiable or grant the motion for rehearing
and conduct a new injunction hearing. See Ey v. State, 960 So. 2d
853, 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (reversing order dismissing
postconviction motion and remanding for trial court to either
2
conduct a hearing on defendant's motion for rehearing, in which he
explained that his reasons and circumstances for his failure to
appear were justifiable, or grant that motion and conduct a hearing
on the merits of the postconviction motion).
Reversed and remanded.
KHOUZAM, C.J., and SMITH, J., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
3