Leondrae A. Hobdy v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJanuary 21, 2022
Docket2D21-1221
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
LEONDRAE HOBDY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D21-1221
January 21, 2022
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(D) from the Circuit
Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.
KHOUZAM, Judge.
Leondrae Hobdy appeals the postconviction court's order
denying his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Mr. Hobdy was
illegally sentenced to equal concurrent sentences as both a habitual
felony offender (HFO) and a prison releasee reoffender (PRR), we
reverse.
A jury found Mr. Hobdy guilty of four felonies, two of which are
relevant here: count one, burglary of a dwelling while armed with a
firearm (a first-degree felony punishable by life imprisonment), and
count two, armed kidnapping (a life felony punishable by life
imprisonment). On each of these counts, Mr. Hobdy was sentenced
to life imprisonment as both an HFO and PRR, with a ten-year
minimum mandatory term pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida
Statutes (2017) (10-20-Life).
The "imposition of equal concurrent sentences under the PRR
and HFO statutes . . . violates the provisions of the PRR statute."
McDonald v. State, 957 So. 2d 605, 608 n.4 (Fla. 2007) (citing Grant
v. State, 770 So. 2d 655, 659 (Fla. 2000)). Rather, courts are only
authorized "to deviate from the prison releasee reoffender
sentencing scheme to impose a greater sentence of incarceration."
Walls v. State, 765 So. 2d 733, 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see also ยง
775.082(9)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017). "[B]ecause a life term under the
habitual felony offender statute is not greater than a life term under
the prison releasee reoffender statute, the trial court was without
2
authority to sentence appellant under the habitual felony offender
statute." Walls, 765 So. 2d at 734.
Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Mr. Hobdy's motion
and remand with directions to strike the habitual felony offender
designations on counts one and two. Id.
Reversed and remanded.
CASANUEVA and STARGEL, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
3