Christian Marcos Ramos v. Natalia Prodigy Williams
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledNovember 12, 2026
Docket4D2026-1631
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
CHRISTIAN MARCOS RAMOS,
Appellant,
v.
NATALIA PRODIGY WILLIAMS,
Appellee.
No. 4D2026-1631
[November 12, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No.
502026CC000614XXXAMB.
Christian Marcos Ramos, West Palm Beach, pro se.
Mauricio A. Torres, Joshua L. Spoont, and Nathaniel M. Edenfield of
Sodhi Spoont Edenfield PLLC, Boca Raton, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Christian Marcos Ramos, appeals from the trial court’s final
dismissal order. Following Appellant’s initiation of this case in the lower
court, a different judge in another case entered an order deeming Appellant
a vexatious litigant. The trial court here then entered a sua sponte
dismissal order, finding that Appellant had failed to comply with the
vexatious litigant order in the case in which that order was entered.
Appellee filed a confession of error, conceding that the dismissal
exceeded the scope of the vexatious litigant order because this case was
filed prior to Appellant being deemed a vexatious litigant. See Walker v.
Ellis, 989 So. 2d 1250, 1251-52 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“Because Appellant's
petition was filed and the action commenced prior to the imposition of
[vexatious litigant] sanctions, the order dismissing Appellant’s petition
based on the sanctions is in error.”). We agree.
Based on the proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s
order and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
2