Dwayne Trenell King v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJanuary 31, 2020
Docket1D19-0130
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-130
_____________________________
DWAYNE TRENELL KING,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.
Mark W. Moseley, Judge.
January 31, 2020
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s postconviction motion filed under Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.850 alleges that he suffers from Post
Traumatic Stress Disorder and Other Specified Trauma and
Stressor Related Disorder from his service in the U.S. Marine
Corps, including two deployments. He alleges that a road-rage
incident triggered his disorders and caused him to engage in the
conduct for which he was arrested, and that his disorders would
have constituted a viable defense at trial, but that his trial counsel
failed to inform him that insanity was available as a defense. The
plea colloquy does not indicate that any such defense was
evaluated. The State argues narrowly that these disorders are not
“insanity” per se, and that Appellant’s negotiated plea of 17 years
in prison followed by 10 years of reporting probation is favorable
enough compared to the statutory maximum of life in prison that
no reasonable person would have gone to trial. While we do not
pass upon the merits of Appellant’s claims, we find that the record
excerpts attached to the trial court’s denial of the 3.850 motion are
insufficient to establish conclusively that Appellant is not entitled
to relief. We therefore reverse and remand for an evidentiary
hearing. See Watts v. State, 136 So. 3d 1225, 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA
2014) (reversing for evidentiary hearing on postconviction claim
that counsel had not advised defendant about an insanity defense,
where plea colloquy did not indicate that the defense had been
evaluated).
REVERSED and REMANDED for evidentiary hearing.
OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Dean R. Galigani and Michael B. Hines of Galigani Law Firm,
Gainesville, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant
Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2