Daniel Taylor v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledAugust 14, 2026
Docket5D2026-0947
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2026-0947
LT Case No. 05-1997-CF-023932-A
_____________________________
DANIEL TAYLOR,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.
Stephen George Henderson, Judge.
Daniel Taylor, Century, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
August 14, 2026
WALLIS, J.
On June 11, 2026, this Court ordered Appellant to respond
within 30 days showing cause as to why he should not be
prohibited from filing any further appeal, petition, pleading or
motion pertaining to the conviction and sentence rendered in
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Brevard County, Case No.
05-1997-CF-023932-A, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney
licensed to practice in the State of Florida. See State v. Spencer,
751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). Appellant has not provided a response
to the June 11th order.
Appellant’s failure to comply with our pending order
confirms his abuse of this Court’s process. Therefore, in order to
conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing
with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above
referenced case. Any further filings regarding the referenced case
will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member
in good standing of the Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d
409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is
further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the
appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary
proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); Simpkins v. State,
909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
APPELLANT PROHIBITED.
LAMBERT and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2