Aaron Thompson v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJune 23, 2021
Docket2D21-0391
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
AARON THOMPSON,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
No. 2D21-391
June 23, 2021
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel.
Sarasota County; Harry M. Rapkin, Judge.
Aaron Thompson, pro se.
ORDER RESTRICTING PETITIONER FROM FUTURE PRO SE
FILINGS
PER CURIAM.
On May 6, 2021, this court dismissed Aaron Thompson's
petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as
untimely and issued an order detailing Thompson's initiation of
twenty proceedings in this court related to his criminal charges in
Sarasota County circuit court case number 04-CF-9345. We noted
that his frequent and meritless filings burdened the limited
resources of this court and interfered with the resolution of genuine
disputes.
Following this court's affirmance of his judgment and
sentences in circuit court case number 04-CF-9345, Thompson
filed two petitions alleging ineffective assistance of appellate
counsel, one petition requesting a belated appeal, six appeals of
orders denying various postconviction motions, five petitions for
writs of habeas corpus, one miscellaneous petition, two petitions for
writs of certiorari, one petition for writ of quo warranto, and one
petition for writ of mandamus. The only relief that Thompson
received was the granting of a belated appeal from a postconviction
order; that appeal was ultimately unsuccessful.
On May 6, 2021, we ordered Thompson to show cause why
this court should not direct the clerk to reject pleadings in this
court related to Thompson's circuit court case number 04-CF-9345
unless the filing addresses a pending appeal or is submitted by a
2
licensed Florida attorney. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48-
49 (Fla. 1999).
Thompson's response fails to satisfy this court's order to show
cause why he should not be prohibited from filing future pro se
appeals and original proceedings in this court. Instead, he
continues to insist that his trial counsel and his appellate counsel
were ineffective and that his sentences are illegal.
Consequently, we direct the clerk of this court to place in an
inactive file any original proceedings or notices of appeal filed by
Thompson related to circuit court case number 04-CF-9345 unless
the filing is signed by a member in good standing of The Florida
Bar. See id.; McKenna v. State, 161 So. 3d 435, 436 (Fla. 2d DCA
2014).
CASANUEVA, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
3