Mary Krupa, James Burk and Aric Meding v. Baycare Health Systems, Inc./Commercial Risk Management, Inc.
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledAugust 31, 2020
Docket1D20-1650
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D20-1650
_____________________________
MARY KRUPA, JAMES BURK and
ARIC MEDING,
Petitioners,
v.
BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEMS,
INC./COMMERCIAL RISK
MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Respondents.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
Date of Accident: January 19, 2019.
August 31, 2020
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner Mary Krupa and her sons seek review of a discovery
order that required her to provide information about her financial
institutions. In response to Krupa’s appellate petition, the
Employer/Carrier (E/C) stipulated to the precise relief that Krupa
and her sons seek, thereby negating the need for this Court to
address the discovery order, which is no longer enforceable. As
such, we dismiss the petition.
DISMISSED.
MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Michael J. Winer of Winer Law Group, P.A., Tampa, and Scott R.
Marshall of Haddad & Associates, Clearwater, for Petitioners.
Christopher A. Hanson of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue,
McLain & Mangan, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents.
2