Bruce McCray v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledApril 20, 2021
Docket1D19-4679
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-4679
_____________________________
BRUCE MCCRAY,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 20, 2021
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s response docketed January
19, 2021, the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is
dismissed. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding
that, generally, a defendant has no right to represent himself in an
extraordinary writ petition in the appellate court while he is
represented by counsel in the criminal case pending in the lower
tribunal); Marsh v. State, 919 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
(finding a pro se petition for writ of mandamus a nullity where
petitioner was represented by counsel below in an involuntary civil
commitment proceeding).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Bruce McCray, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2