Full Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CATHERINE ELIZABETH CZYZ; THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, P.A.; and THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellants, v. ERIN BETH NEITZELT, Appellee. No. 2D22-63 December 16, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: IT IS ORDERED that the mandate is withdrawn. Appellant Catherine Elizabeth Czyz's motion for clarification filed December 13, 2022, is denied. On the court's own motion, the opinion issued November 16, 2022, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate contemporaneously. I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER. MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CATHERINE ELIZABETH CZYZ; THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, P.A.; and THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellants, v. ERIN BETH NEITZELT, Appellee. No. 2D22-63 December 16, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Lee County; James Shenko, Judge. Catherine Elizabeth Czyz, pro se. Wienna Jane Ingraham, Orlando, for Appellants The Czyz Law Firm, P.A., and The Czyz Law Firm, PLLC. Scott E. Atwood of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Dismissed. See Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ., Bd. of Trs. v. United Fac. of Fla., 301 So. 3d 1030, 1031-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019); Cordero v. Washington Mut. Bank, 241 So. 3d 967, 968 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). KELLY, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.