Full Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 16, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-2271 Lower Tribunal No. 19-0171 ________________ Bridge Golde, Appellant, vs. Pix Realty, L.P., Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull, Judge. Bridge Golde, in proper person. Nexterra Law, and Eric A. Jacobs, and Steven M. Liberty, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ. LINDSEY, J. This appeal stems from a commercial eviction of a tenant brought under Chapter 83 of the Florida Statutes for nonpayment of rent. The County Court entered a Final Judgment of Possession in favor of Appellee, the landlord, and against Appellant, the tenant. Appellant took an appeal of the County Court’s final judgment to the Circuit Appellate Division of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. In the circuit appellate proceeding, Appellant filed a motion styled, Motion to Strike and Objection to Late Filing of Answer Brief. The Circuit Court entered its Order Denying the Motion (the “Order”), which is the subject of this appeal. The Order is not a final appealable order and does not fall into one of the categories of non-final appealable orders set forth in Rule 9.130 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. As such, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 1 See Local Door Coupons Franchise, Inc. v. Mayers, 261 So. 3d 726, 728 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“This Court has appellate jurisdiction to review only those non-final trial court orders scheduled in Florida Rule of Appellate 1 Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(B), District Courts of Appeal may review final orders of circuit courts acting in their appellate capacities. “[A] nonfinal order entered by a circuit court in its appellate capacity is not an order that can be appealed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110 or 9.130.” Hayman v. State, 634 So. 2d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Moreover, “[w]hether the courts of appeal have certiorari jurisdiction over non-final orders of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity is questionable.” Martin v. Doe, 731 So. 2d 806, 806 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). But even under our certiorari jurisdiction, dismissal would be proper. See id. (“Although irreparable injury can occur as a result of a non-final order of a trial court, it is difficult for us to conceive of a non-final order of an appellate court which would cause irreparable injury.”). 2 Procedure 9.130(a)(3)”); Jenne v. Maranto, 825 So. 2d 409, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (“The enumerated categories of permissible nonfinal review stated in rule 9.130 must be limited to their plain meaning. The rule does not authorize judges to enlarge its provisions to permit review of nonfinal orders not specified within its provisions.” (citation omitted)). Dismissed. 3