Mohammed Alsaloussi v. Christopher Drummond
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledNovember 12, 2026
Docket3D2025-1686
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed November 12, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D2025-1686
Lower Tribunal No. 23-12944-CA-01
________________
Mohammed Alsaloussi, et al.,
Appellants,
vs.
Christopher Drummond,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lisa S.
Walsh, Judge.
ZEICHMAN LAW, and Thomas G. Zeichman, for appellants.
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP, and Jesse Panuccio, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and REBULL, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. See Gazil v. Gazil, 343 So. 2d 595, 597 (Fla. 1977)
(“Where the appellant has disobeyed an order of the trial court, the appellate
court may, in its discretion, either entertain or dismiss an appeal.”);
Spataru v. Fla. Dep’t of Transp., 275 So. 3d 248, 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
(Dismissal “is justified where a party shows deliberate and contumacious
disregard of the court’s authority or willful disregard or gross indifference to
an order of the court.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting
Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944, 946 (Fla. 1983)); see also Gazil, 343
So. 2d at 597 (“Where one absconds from the jurisdiction, of course, there
is no way for the Court to enforce its order, and an appeal could properly be
dismissed.”); see 17 C.J.S. Contempt § 27 (2026) (“The inability to perform
must be real, honest, and not self-induced. A party will be punished for
contempt when the inability to obey is brought about voluntarily, as through
negligence, fraud, sharp practices, or intentional avoidance.” (footnotes
omitted)); accord In re Lawrence, 279 F.3d 1294, 1300 (11th Cir. 2002); see
United States v. Barnette, 129 F.3d 1179, 1184 (11th Cir. 1997) (“He who
offends against the law seeks in vain the help of the law”);
Lieberman v. Marshall, 236 So. 2d 120, 128 (Fla. 1970) (“[S]ome cannot
understand that he who flouts the law cannot be confident of the protection
of any law.”).
2