State of Florida v. Luke Kluttz
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMarch 10, 2020
Docket1D18-2215
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-2215
_____________________________
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
LUKE KLUTTZ,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Martin A. Fitzpatrick, Judge.
March 10, 2020
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
On the motion of a party, a judge in regular active service on
the Court requested that a vote be taken on the motion in
accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331(d)(1).
All judges in regular active service that have not been recused
voted on the motion. Less than a majority of those judges voted in
favor of rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the motion for rehearing
en banc is denied.
RAY, C.J., and WOLF, LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, ROWE,
OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, JAY, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ.,
concur.
MAKAR, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., dissent.
B.L. THOMAS, J., concurs with opinion, in which OSTERHAUS, J.,
joins.
TANENBAUM, J., concurs with opinion, in which OSTERHAUS, J.,
joins; and in which B.L. THOMAS, J., joins as to Part II only.
MAKAR, J., dissents with opinion, in which BILBREY, J., joins.
KELSEY, J., recused.
_____________________________
B.L. THOMAS, J., concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
I concur in the denial of rehearing en banc for the same
reasons stated in State v. Petagine, No. 1D18-2086 (Fla. 1st DCA
Mar. 10, 2020).
TANENBAUM, J., concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
I concur in the denial of rehearing en banc for the same
reasons stated in State v. Petagine, No. 1D18-2086 (Fla. 1st DCA
Mar. 10, 2020).
MAKAR, J., dissenting in part from denial of rehearing en banc.
I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissental in State v.
Petagine, No. 1D18-2086 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 10, 2020).
_____________________________
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant/Cross-
Appellee.
Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman, P.A., Tallahassee, for
Appellee/Cross-Appellant Kluttz; Brian L. Tannebaum of Brian L.
Tannebaum, P.A., Miami, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Petagine.
2