Roseline Pierre v. the State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMarch 18, 2020
Docket3D20-0353
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed March 18, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-353
Lower Tribunal No. 19-3811
________________
Roseline Pierre,
Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction—Mandamus.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant
Public Defender, for petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney
General, for respondent.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Petition denied. See Santopolo v. State, 443 So. 2d 1059, 1060 (Fla. 2d DCA
1984) (holding that petitioner was not entitled to an adversary preliminary hearing,
despite State not filing information or indictment within twenty-one days from date
of arrest or service of capias, because petitioner received all available relief afforded
by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.133(b)(1) upon his release from custody);
Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (holding that
mandamus is not available to require the performance of a futile act).
2