Mitchell W. Reiblich v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledFebruary 26, 2021
Docket1D21-0145
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D21-145
_____________________________
MITCHELL W. REIBLICH,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK S. INCH, Secretary,
Florida Department of
Corrections,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
February 26, 2021
PER CURIAM.
Mitchell Reiblich seeks certiorari review of a final order
rendered by the circuit court in Hamilton County. Reiblich’s
complaint challenged the legality of his judgment and sentence
rendered by the circuit court in Sarasota County, and the trial
court dismissed his complaint for want of jurisdiction.
We treat the certiorari petition as seeking plenary appellate
review of the final order, rather than seeking second-tier review
under Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla.
1998). Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c) (“If a party seeks an improper
remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the proper remedy had
been sought; provided that it shall not be the responsibility of the
court to seek the proper remedy.”). Still, after considering Mr.
Reiblich’s argument addressed to the merits of the circuit court’s
order, see Osborne v. Tucker, 80 So. 3d 413, 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
(treating certiorari petition as initial brief), we find that he has not
demonstrated a preliminary basis for relief. Cf. Fla. R. App. P.
9.100(h) (stating that the court may direct the filing of a response
if “the petition demonstrates a preliminary basis for relief”). The
circuit court correctly dismissed the complaint because it lacked
jurisdiction. See Zuluaga v. Dep’t of Corr., 32 So. 3d 674, 677 (Fla.
1st DCA 2010).
DENIED.
B.L. THOMAS, KELSEY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Mitchell W. Reiblich, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Lance Eric Neff,
General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for
Respondent.
2