John Joseph Ploeckelmann v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJanuary 22, 2020
Docket2D18-4394
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JOHN JOSEPH PLOECKELMANN, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D18-4394
)
STATE OF FLORIDA, )
)
Appellee. )
)
Opinion filed January 22, 2020.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas
County; William H. Burgess III, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
Daniel Muller, Assistant Public Defender,
Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Lindsay D. Turner,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for
Appellee.
LaROSE, Judge.
The trial court revoked John Joseph Ploeckelmann's probation and
sentenced him to twenty-four months' imprisonment for possession of cocaine. We
have jurisdiction over his appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A); 9.140(b)(1)(D),
(F). Mr. Ploeckelmann raises several issues, all of which we affirm without comment.
However, the record reflects a scrivener's error in the order before us.
Specifically, at the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the trial court
orally pronounced that Mr. Ploeckelmann had violated conditions six, eight, and
eighteen of his probation. The written revocation order, however, cites only to condition
six. Thus, we remand for correction. See Gonzalez v. State, 176 So. 3d 993, 994 (Fla.
2d DCA 2015) ("The order of revocation states that Gonzalez violated condition three of
his probation; on remand, it should be corrected to reflect that the trial court orally found
that Gonzalez violated condition one."),
Affirmed; remanded for entry of a corrected order of revocation of
probation.
NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-2-