Michael Joseph Nilio v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledFebruary 18, 2020
Docket1D18-5093
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-5093
_____________________________
MICHAEL JOSEPH NILIO,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Linda F. McCallum, Judge.
February 18, 2020
PER CURIAM.
Michael Joseph Nilio appeals an order summarily dismissing
his third motion for postconviction relief challenging his 2017
convictions for aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and
possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The postconviction
court found that it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion because
Nilio had two postconviction appeals pending in this Court. We
reverse.
We have held that where a defendant files a postconviction
motion while another postconviction appeal is still pending, the
trial court still has jurisdiction to consider the motion โso long as
the issues raised in the two cases are unrelated.โ Cannie v. State,
277 So. 3d 754, 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (quoting Bates v. State,
704 So. 2d 562, 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)) (emphasis omitted); see
Kimmel v. State, 629 So. 2d 1110, 1110โ1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
(setting out and explaining this principle); accord Bryant v. State,
102 So. 3d 660, 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (en banc); Jackman v.
State, 88 So. 3d 325, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (en banc); Siskos v.
State, 163 So. 3d 739, 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); but see Rua-
Torbizco v. State, 237 So. 3d 1065, 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
(โ[O]nce the notice of appeal of the order denying the first motion
for postconviction relief has been filed, the trial court is without
jurisdiction to consider the second motion for postconviction relief
while that appeal remains pending.โ). Nilioโs third postconviction
motion did not present any issues related to his previous motions.
Thus, the trial court did not lack jurisdiction to rule on Nilioโs
motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
RAY, C.J., and ROWE and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Michael Joseph Nilio, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2