Clayteon Nathaniel Steen v. State of Florida

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CLAYTEON NATHANIEL STEEN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-4965 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 17, 2020. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Clayteon Nathaniel Steen, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Valdez-Garcia v. State, 965 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Sims v. State, 141 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). MORRIS, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.