Shakeel Charles v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledNovember 4, 2026
Docket1D2026-0332
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2026-0332
_____________________________
SHAKEEL CHARLES,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.
Timothy Allen Register, Judge.
November 4, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Daise v. State, 379 So. 3d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
NORDBY and LONG, JJ., concur; Winokur, J., concurs with opinion.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
WINOKUR, J., concurring.
Application of Daise v. State, 370 So. 3d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA
2024), leads to affirmance of the order below. However, as I
indicated in Owens v. State, Daise interprets the current Florida
Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850(g) and (h)(2) in a manner that
unjustifiably cuts off a postconviction movantโs right to file a
timely amended rule 3.850 motion. 401 So. 3d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA
2025) (Winokur, J., concurring). When a postconviction movant
has been given sixty days to amend a legally insufficient motion
pursuant to rules 3.850(g) and (h)(2) and fails to file an amended
motion in that time, the court is free to enter a final, appealable
order summarily denying the motion with prejudice, and any
amended motion after that time would have to meet the standards
of rule 3.850(j) for successive motions. But if the court has not
entered a final, appealable order summarily denying the motion
with prejudice at the time the movant files an amended motion,
the amended motion should be considered if it is otherwise timely.
Daise, as well as Ivory v. State, 159 So. 3d 197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015),
on which it is based, prematurely cuts off the two-year period in
which a defendant may file a rule 3.850 motion. Rule 3.850 should
be amended to clarify this well-settled rule.
_____________________________
Shakeel Charles, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2