Full Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2025-0473 Lower Tribunal No. 2002-CF-001999 _____________________________ KEITH ALAN ERSKINE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County. Michelle O. Pincket, Judge. September 4, 2026 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392, 400 (Fla. 2025) (“Erlinger is not a development of fundamental significance under our existing retroactivity test.”), cert. denied sub nom. 145 S. Ct. 2789 (2025); Maye v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly S116, *4 (Fla. May 14, 2026) (holding that Apprendi-type claims are no longer properly raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion), reh’g denied, No. SC2023-1184, 2026 WL 2243835 (Fla. Aug. 4, 2026). STARGEL, WOZNIAK and SMITH, JJ., concur. Keith Alan Erskine, Cross City, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Frances Muir, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED 2