Sharrieff Corey Pope v. DT Residential North LLC
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledAugust 20, 2026
Docket3D2025-2283
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed August 20, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-2283
Lower Tribunal No. 25-156330-CC-05
________________
Sharrieff Corey Pope and Yoselyn Cardozo,
Appellants,
vs.
DT Residential North, LLC and DT Residential South, LLC,
Appellees.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Miesha
Darrough, Judge.
Sharrieff Corey Pope and Yoselyn Cardozo, in proper persons.
The MGFD Law Firm, and Whitney Helen Daly (Palm Harbor), for
appellees.
Before SCALES, C.J., and MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (โWhen there are issues of fact the appellant
necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence.
Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly
resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial courtโs
judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.
Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court
reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to
require reversal. The trial court should have been affirmed because the
record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate
reversible error.โ); see also Johnston v. Hudlett, 32 So. 3d 700, 704 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2010) (holding a partyโs objection to evidence is waived by not asserting
at trial); State v. Hampton, 44 So. 3d 661, 665โ66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (โ[A]s
a general rule, a defendant is expected to make a contemporaneous
objection to issues arising during trial. This is true, in part, because the
objection gives the trial court and opposing counsel an opportunity to prevent
or correct the error. Evidence, which may seem irrelevant and thereby
objectionable when the foundational evidence is weak, may become quite
relevant if the party seeking its admission is permitted to ask a few additional
questions.โ).
2