David F. Petrano and Katherine Day-Petrano v. Darlene P. Baylor
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMarch 12, 2020
Docket1D18-1334
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-1334
_____________________________
DAVID F. PETRANO, and
KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO,
Appellants,
v.
DARLENE P. BAYLOR,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.
Monica J. Brasington, Judge.
March 12, 2020
PER CURIAM.
Appellants challenge the final judgment of foreclosure and the
amended final judgment of foreclosure on grounds that the trial
court lacked jurisdiction, indispensable party defendants were not
joined, the mortgage was ineffective to encumber the real property
at issue, and other factual matters not preserved for appellate
review. โWithout a transcript, and in the absence of fundamental
error on its face, an appellate court will affirm a trial courtโs
decision.โ Tramontana v. Bank of New York Mellon, 230 So. 3d
601, 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Appellants fail to establish any
jurisdictional defect in the judgments on appeal. In addition,
Appellants fail to show that the trial court committed any errors
of fact or of law in the judgments based on the documents in the
record. The orders on appeal are therefore AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
David F. Petrano and Mary Katherine Day-Petrano, pro se,
Hawthorne, Appellants.
Ronald A. Hertel of Chiumento Dwyer Hertel Grant & Kistemaker,
PL, Palm Coast, for Appellee.
2