Jean Ulysse v. Vineland Investment Partners Phase 11, LLC
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledSeptember 10, 2026
Docket6D2025-2767
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-2767
Lower Tribunal No. 2025-CC-005586
_____________________________
JEAN ULYSSE,
Appellant,
v.
VINELAND INVESTMENT PARTNERS PHASE II, LLC,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal from the County Court for Osceola County.
Juna M. Pulayya, Judge.
September 10, 2026
SMITH, J.
Appellant, Jean Ulysse (“Ulysse”), appeals the final default judgment in favor
of Appellee, Vineland Investment Partners Phase II, LLC (“Vineland”), in relation
to Vineland’s residential eviction action. Vineland moved to strike Ulysse’s Initial
Brief as, among other things, it lacked any citations to the record. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.210(b)(3) (requires initial brief to contain “references to the appropriate pages
of the record or transcript”). We granted Vineland’s motion and struck Ulysse’s
Initial Brief. Ulysse’s Amended Initial Brief is fifty-six pages long, yet it again does
not contain a single citation to the record on appeal. “[I]t is not the function of the
Court to rebrief an appeal.” Polyglycoat Corp. v. Hirsch Distribs, Inc., 442 So. 2d
958, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); see also Walker v. Est. of Yee, 376 So. 3d 758, 758
(Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (applying the principles set forth in Polyglycoat to pro se
litigants). As Ulysse’s arguments are insufficiently briefed, we therefore affirm.
We also note that seven of the cases cited in Ulysse’s Amended Initial Brief—
which he cites a total of at least twenty times—do not exist. Ulysse is directed to
show cause within ten days of the issuance of this opinion why he should not be
sanctioned for filing a brief that contains non-existent cases. Potential sanctions
include the imposition of a requirement that a member of the Florida Bar in good
standing review and sign any future filings in this Court on behalf of Appellant in
any matter in which he seeks review of the underlying action (Lower Tribunal No.
2025-CC-5586-EV). See Hessert v. Hessert, 431 So. 3d 610, 615 (Fla. 6th DCA
2026).
AFFIRMED. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED.
TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL, J., concur.
Jean Ulysse, Kissimmee, pro se.
William J. McCabe, Longwood, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
2