RYAN ATKIN v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJune 24, 2020
Docket3D19-1492
StatusPublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed June 24, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-1492
Lower Tribunal No. 09-87096
________________
Ryan Atkin, et al.,
Appellants,
vs.
Bank of New York Mellon, et al.,
Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A.
Hanzman, Judge.
Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs, for appellants.
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, and Lauren G. Raines, Tara M. Petzoldt
and Cheryl J. Lister (Tampa); Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, and Elizabeth A.
Henriques, for appellees.
Before SCALES, MILLER and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Pino v. Bank of N.Y., 121 So. 3d 23, 26 (Fla. 2013) (โ[W]hen
a defendant alleges fraud on the court as a basis for seeking to set aside a plaintiffโs
voluntary dismissal, the trial court has jurisdiction to reinstate the dismissed action
only when the fraud, if proven, resulted in the plaintiff securing affirmative relief to
the detriment of the defendant and, upon obtaining that relief, voluntarily dismissing
the case to prevent the trial court from undoing the improperly obtained relief.โ);
U.S. Bank Natโl Assโn v. Rivera, 193 So. 3d 954, 956-57 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (โ[A]
rule 1.420(a)(1) voluntary dismissal is jurisdictional and serves to terminate the
litigation, instantaneously divesting the lower court of jurisdiction to entertain
further motions or to enter further orders that would otherwise either dispose of the
case on the merits or revive the original action. . . . [T]rial courts currently enjoy no
inherent authority to disregard voluntary dismissals.โ).
2