Mark Agenor v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledOctober 13, 2021
Docket2D20-3052
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
MARK AGENOR,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D20-3052
October 13, 2021
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit
Court for Polk County; Keith P. Spoto, Judge.
Mark Agenor, pro se.
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Mark Agenor appeals the partial denial of his motion to correct
sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.800(a). We reverse insofar as the order rejected Agenor's
assertion that his sentence for count III of circuit court case
number 2015-CF-7225 should reflect his entitlement to a judicial
review.
In that count Agenor was convicted of a burglary with an
assault or battery, committed when he was seventeen years old.
The trial court sentenced him to twenty-five years in prison. In
2020, Agenor filed a postconviction motion seeking to have his
sentences on several counts in two cases corrected to reflect that he
is entitled to a judicial review of his sentences under sections
775.082 and 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2015) (providing for
judicial review for juvenile offenders for certain offenses and
sentence lengths). The State opposed the motion as to the count at
issue here, arguing that burglary with an assault or battery is a
"simple first[-]degree felony" to which the review statutes did not
apply. The postconviction court, apparently persuaded by the
State's argument, denied Agenor any relief on count III.
But the State's argument and the postconviction court's ruling
were incorrect. Section 810.02(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2015),
plainly categorizes burglary with an assault or battery as a "felony
of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years
not exceeding life imprisonment." See also Bowers v. State, 679 So.
2
2d 340, 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ("[B]urglary with assault is a first[-
]degree felony punishable by life."). In turn, sections 775.082(3)(c)
and 921.1402(2)(d) provide that a person under the age of eighteen,
who commits any felony punishable by life (other than those listed
in the murder statute, section 784.02) and who is sentenced to a
term of more than twenty years, is entitled to a review of that
sentence after the first twenty years are served. See also Graham v.
State, 286 So. 3d 800, 803 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (explaining the
different classifications of offenses eligible for review under section
921.1402). Clearly, Agenor's conviction and twenty-five-year
sentence on count III qualify for a twenty-year review.
Therefore, we reverse the order on appeal as to count III of
case number 2015-CF-7225. On remand, the court shall amend
Agenor's sentence on this count to reflect that he is entitled to a
judicial review after twenty years in accordance with this opinion
and the cited statutes. We affirm the order in all other respects.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
LaROSE and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
3
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
4