Christina Paylan, M. D. v. Lyann Goudie, Esq., Goudie & Kohn, P.A.
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJanuary 3, 2020
Docket2D19-1805
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D., )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D19-1805
)
LYANN GOUDIE, ESQ. and GOUDIE )
& KOHN, P.A., )
)
Appellees. )
)
Opinion filed January 3, 2020.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130
from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough
County; Gregory P. Holder, Judge.
Christina Paylan, M.D., pro se.
Elizabeth C. Tosh and Daniel A. Shapiro
of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa,
for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Christina Paylan, M.D., challenges a nonfinal injunctive sanction order
finding her to be a vexatious litigant and subject to prefiling requirements for future
actions. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App.
P. 9.040(c) ("If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the
proper remedy had been sought . . . ."); Harris v. Gattie, 263 So. 3d 829, 830 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2019) (treating notice of appeal of order forbidding Harris from filing further pro se
papers in the case and any other future case as a petition for writ of certiorari), and we
deny the petition.
Petition denied.
CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
-2-