Michael Jones v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMarch 26, 2020
Docket1D18-4362
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-4362
_____________________________
MICHAEL JONES,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Robert E. Long, Judge.
March 26, 2020
PER CURIAM.
Michael Jones appeals the trial court’s revocation of his
probation. As the State concedes, we must reverse because an
affidavit of violation of probation is not included in the record on
appeal. However, because the record reflects the possibility that a
violation affidavit was filed in this case, we remand to the trial
court for further proceedings directed at locating and considering
the affidavit. See Raimondi v. State, 253 So. 3d 749, 750–51 (Fla.
3d DCA 2018) (explaining that “[i]t is well-settled that ‘[i]t is a due
process violation and fundamental error to revoke probation for
violations not alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation,’”
and remanding for the trial court “to conduct further proceedings
directed at locating and considering the relevant affidavit” because
the record did not contain the affidavit, but revealed the possibility
that it was filed, and “to enter a written order specifying the basis
for its revocation of community control” because the record did not
contain a written order of revocation (citation omitted)); see also
Lishinsky v. State, 219 So. 3d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (similar). If
the trial court finds on remand that a violation affidavit was filed
in this case, we instruct it to enter a written order revoking Jones’s
probation and specifying the basis for revocation because, as the
State acknowledges, the court erred by failing to enter a written
order of revocation. * See Hodges v. State, 262 So. 3d 842, 846 (Fla.
1st DCA 2018) (explaining that upon revoking a defendant’s
probation, the trial court must render a written order of revocation
specifying the conditions of probation that were violated).
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.
RAY, C.J., and LEWIS and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Kevin Alvarez of Law Office of Kevin Alvarez P.A., Tallahassee, for
Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Herrera, Assistant
Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Upon the entry of a written order of revocation of probation,
Jones may appeal if he contends that any of the grounds relied on
by the trial court are not supported by the evidence. See Mitchell
v. State, 238 So. 3d 386, 387 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); see also
Raimondi, 253 So. 3d at 751 n.4.
2