Iryna Hrachova v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledSeptember 25, 2026
Docket5D2025-2337
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-2337
LT Case No. 42-2024-CA-1321
_____________________________
IRYNA HRACHOVA,
Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST
COMPANY AMERICAS,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Lisa Diane Herndon, Judge.
Iryna Hrachova, Silver Springs, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
September 25, 2026
KILBANE, J.
Iryna Hrachova (“Appellant”) appeals an order sua sponte
dismissing her complaint with prejudice. Because this dismissal
occurred without notice or an opportunity to be heard, we reverse.1
1. This opinion does not address the merits of Appellant’s
claims and affirms the remaining issue without further comment.
In July 2024, Appellant sued Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas (“Deutsche Bank”) for declaratory relief and quiet title
as to certain real property. After she obtained a clerk’s default,
Appellant moved for a final default judgment. Instead, the trial
court sua sponte dismissed the complaint with prejudice based on
its finding that the property was subject to a final judgment of
foreclosure that this Court affirmed. See Hrachova v. Deutsche
Bank, 300 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). Thus, it held her claims
were barred by res judicata. Because the court violated
Appellant’s procedural due process rights in sua sponte dismissing
the complaint without notice or an opportunity to be heard based
on an unpled affirmative defense, this matter is reversed and
remanded for further proceedings. See Loancare, LLC v. Chestnut,
326 So. 3d 1220, 1220–21 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021).
REVERSED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED for
further proceedings.
WALLIS and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2