Blackmon v. Saint Elizabeth Hospital
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
Date FiledOctober 28, 2026
DocketCivil Action No. 2026-3169
JudgeJudge Trevor N. McFadden
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CHRISTIAN BLACKMON, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 26-03169 (UNA)
)
)
SAINT ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL, )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a form Complaint for a Civil Case and an application
to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). For the following reasons, the Court grants the IFP application
and dismisses the complaint.
Plaintiff sues Saint Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, D.C., for $4 billion. In the section
designated for stating a claim, Plaintiff writes only discrimination. In the relief section, Plaintiff
writes only malpractice.
Although pro se complaints are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal
pleadings drafted by lawyers, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), they must comport with
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule
8(a) requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of (1) the grounds for the court’s
jurisdiction, (2) the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) the relief demanded.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). It “does not require detailed factual allegations, but it demands more than an
unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,
678 (2009) (cleaned up). The pleader must allege enough facts to permit a court “to infer more
than the mere possibility of misconduct.” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., 789 F.3d 146, 150
(D.C. Cir. 2015) (cleaned up). Plaintiff has not pleaded the basis of federal court jurisdiction and
alleged facts to provide “fair notice” of the claims and “the grounds upon which [they] rest.” Jones
v. Kirchner, 835 F.3d 74, 79 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S.
544, 555 (2007)). Therefore, this case will be dismissed by separate order.
TREVOR N. McFADDEN
Date: October 28, 2026 United States District Judge
2