Paul Farquharson v. Huntington Debt Holding, LLC, Assignee of Capital on Tap
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledJune 24, 2026
DocketA26A2284
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
June 24, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A2284. PAUL FARQUHARSON v. HUNTINGTON DEBT HOLDING, LLC,
ASSIGNEE OF CAPITAL ON TAP.
Huntington Debt Holding, LLC, as assignee of Capital on Tap (“Huntington
Debt”), filed suit against Paul Farquharson to recover credit card debt. The trial court
granted Huntington Debt’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in the
amount of $6,793.78 plus $273.00 in court costs. Farquharson then filed this direct
appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
Under OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(6), an application for discretionary appeal is required
to obtain appellate review in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or
less. “Although the grant of a motion for summary judgment is in general directly
appealable, where the amount of the judgment is $ 10,000 or less, an application for
discretionary appeal is required.” Thompson v. Salacoa Highland Prop. Owners’ Ass’n, 295
Ga. App. 478, 480 (672 SE2d 448) (2009) (quotation marks omitted). “Compliance with
the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human
Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Farquharson’s failure to file a
discretionary application thus deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which
is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
06/24/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.